Prevention: still better than cure?
Drugs can prevent disease as well as cure it. Should we
be loading up on pharmaceuticals to stay healthy?
What would you say if you heard that drugs were being pumped
into the water supply? Would it horrify you? In fact, it has been
going on for decades, with fluoride. Six million people in the UK
currently drink tap water spiked with fluoride.
When fluoridation began in 1945 it was hailed as a harmless
chemical to prevent tooth decay. But the practice has had its
critics, who claim fluoride can cause a range of health problems -
from tooth mottling to cancer (the evidence for which is not
strong).
The Government backs water fluoridation as a cost-effective way
to tackle tooth decay, insisting that there is no evidence to
suggest it is dangerous and plenty of evidence that it reduces
tooth decay. However, some people feel it should be a matter of
choice. Fluoride can also be obtained easily from toothpaste.
Plans to make people eat folic acid by adding it to bread have
also ignited controversy. The UK's food watchdog, the Food
Standards Agency, recently proposed that all white flour be
fortified with extra folic acid, a synthetic form of vitamin B9, to
reduce the number of babies born with spina bifida. It is now up to
ministers to decide whether to go ahead with the proposal.
Folate is found in many foods, particularly green vegetables.
Experts agree, however, that diet is unlikely to provide enough of
this vitamin. So currently all mothers-to-be are urged to take
folic acid supplements. Babies born with spina bifida grow to
adulthood with paralysis and bowel and bladder incontinence.
Compulsory fortification already happens in the USA, Canada and
Chile, and the number of neural tube defects such as spina bifida
has been cut by between 27 and 50 per cent. In the UK, around 200
babies each year are born with neural tube defects - which could be
avoided, some experts say, if folic acid were added to bread.
But some consumers argue that compulsory fortification of all
flour restricts their choice. There are health issues too, as some
research suggests that over-consumption of folic acid may increase
the risk of bowel cancer and, in elderly people, lead to brittle
bones.
If a wonder pill existed that could prevent society's number one
killers - heart attack and stroke - should all adults be taking it?
Controversy flared in 2003 when two British doctors proposed the
idea of a polypill - a mix of aspirin (to prevent blood clots), a
statin (to lower cholesterol) and two blood-pressure lowering
agents. They argued that, taken daily by all people aged over 55,
this polypill could slash heart attacks and strokes by more than 80
per cent.
Hold on, said critics - such a pill would medicalise life and
undermine an individual's responsibility to keep fit. Dutch
scientists came up with an alternative. Forget the pills, they
said, and dine regularly on the 'polymeal': fish, garlic, almonds,
fruits and vegetables, dark chocolate and wine. These natural
alternatives could cut heart diseases. And would be more enjoyable
too.
Joking aside, there is a growing emphasis on disease prevention.
Is there any reason pharmaceuticals should not be part of the way
we stay fit and healthy?